Colin wrote:for hoby:
the term well-produced doesn't mean does it meet a certain criteria. "does it sound clean enough?" its more about the purpose you can tell by musical instincts what a band was trying to achieve and did they get there point across.
Thanks for your definition, Colin. I'm not sure yet that I agree with all of it, though. While I didn't mention "criteria" in my question, I did mention purpose and unfortunately, the purpose of a production isn't always about what a
band is trying to achieve
musically.
For instance, whatever you want to say about the musical quality of boy band/pop tart music, there's no denying that the production on those discs does exactly what it needs to do to move units; to sell the Britney or Justin
brand. It's got the hooks; the arrangements and sonics are tweaked perfectly to catch the attention through the hips; and it goes great with the video.
does it also create an atmosphere or sense. its a personal opinion more than anything else. is it a great album or not?
So, are you saying that a definition of great production is purely personal opinion? Of course, as with anything having to do with art, that has to be true to a certain extent. Perhaps my question would have been better framed as "what makes up your personal definition of great production?"
As someone who's spent a couple of decades in production, I agree that in music production, whether a band's intent is well-served is an important factor in the kind of production that most interests me. (Eisenhower is a perfect example of this.) History is littered with stories of bands or performers forced into production choices they didn't agree with on a record because the record company knew best. We all know how those turned out.
(Perhaps the most daring reaction to this type of thing was Sinead O'Connor's. When her record company insisted on trying to market her as yet another pop sex kitten, she shaved her head to make sure there was no way that could happen. Ah, Sinead...) Ahem, sorry, where was I...
Ah, yes; atmosphere, sense of place or space, yeah, definite points on my checklist. How does the production engage the listener? How is the listener rewarded for deeper engagement? Does the record give up more and more secrets with repeated deep listening? These are the things I look for.
What makes the production great can vary depending on the genre of the project. For one record imagination and new sounds can be what does it (You mention Radiohead, for me it's early Eno pop). For another, a faithful catalog of iconic sounds can be the measure (Chris Isaak, the guitar tones of any Stones-emulating group).
For me it keeps coming back to: What were the goals of the project and were they served?
Now, I could talk about this for hours (and often do when it is really talking rather typing) but here are some examples of some of the points I'm trying to make:
The Darling Buds - Crawdaddy (produced by Stephen Street)
A disc clearly designed to be a girl-fronted pop/rock confection and it succeeds beautifully. Arrangements and instrumentation all designed to build a frame around an iconic female pop voice. I always pull this one out as an example of a smart attempt at iconic, just the right side of cliched, pop.
The Latin Playboys - Self-titled first disc and Dose (Mitch Froom and Tchad Blake)
A chance for David Hidalgo and LouiePerez to explore their experimental side with the help of an amazing production team. Talk about a sense of place. These records are positively transportational. Sit down and listen carefully and you will be taken on a trip. It does feel positively psychedelic at times.
U2 - Achtung Baby and Zooropa (Brian Eno/Daniel Lanois)
Two of my favorite records ever. A band that desperately needed to reinvent themselves brought in this team for Unforgettable Fire and they all worked together through the next three discs as well. Enough's been written about them that I'm sure you know about them already and either love them or not. But even if you're not a fan of the band I think these discs are worth studying as productions. I wasn't interested in U2 until I heard these discs.
World Party - Goodbye Jumbo (Karl Wallinger)
Karl Wallinger is in love with the '60s and he nails them perfectly on this disc. You'll hear references to the Stones, Dylan, George Harrison, John Lennon, and lots more.
radiohead are experts at using odd sounds and noise without overdoing it [idioteque].
I'm still trying to
get Radiohead. I can recognize that what they've done is very important but I haven't found myself enjoying it enough that I want to go back and listen again. Maybe it's time I tried again.
Also, based on this thread, I guess I really need to make time for Wilco. Lord knows, I've read enough about them. I just need to move them up the list of things I've been meaning to get to.
the dropped 4th beat on airplane/prim shortly before they make the transition to the slow part. i may be mistaken, but it sounds like the cut beat was done in production, not in studio - based on the little hints in the sound.
What hints are you hearing?
note: a great song can easily be ruined by production
Hmm. Can a crappy song be saved by production.
the production is great because it is some of the most innovative stuff ive heard in a long time... and it keeps getting better!
To quote Paul Reiser, "This is what I'm saying."
I really could go on forever, but I'll close with a very short list of producers/artists whose production work I love and inspires me:
Brian Eno
Daniel Lanois
Michael Brook
Beta Band
There are lots more, but I'll stop with these.
hoby